2017’s Best & Worst Places to Retire
2:31 AMPosted by: Richie Bernardo
After toiling in the workplace for decades, it seems only natural to expect financial security in our golden years. But few of us can look forward to a cushy retirement. According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute’s 2017 Retirement Confidence Survey, six in 10 workers reported feeling at least somewhat confident that they’ll have adequate finances to retire comfortably, but only 18 percent reported a high level of confidence. Nearly four in 10, in fact, have little or no retirement savings whatsoever. Many are even worried about covering basic living expenses once they leave the workforce.
If such a large proportion of American workers cannot grow a nest egg for their future, what other options provide a pathway to a comfortable retirement? For some, the only solution is to keep working. The EBRI survey found that four in 10 workers today expect to retire at age 70, as opposed to the median expected retirement age of 65. The alternative? Relocate to an area where you can stretch your dollar without sacrificing your lifestyle.
To help Americans plan an affordable retirement while maintaining the best quality of life, WalletHub’s analysts compared the retiree-friendliness of the 150 largest U.S. cities across 40 key metrics. Our data set ranges from cost of living to retired taxpayer-friendliness to availability of recreational activities. Read on for our findings, expert retirement advice and a full description of our methodology.
If you’re considering retiring out of state, make sure to check out WalletHub’s “Best & Worst States to Retire” ranking, too.
Main FindingsEmbed on your website<iframe src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/embed/6165/geochart-retired.html" width="556" height="347" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe> <div style="width:556px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="http://ift.tt/2vXKSeK;
Overall Rank |
City |
Total Score |
‘Affordability’ Rank |
‘Activities’ Rank |
‘Quality of Life’ Rank |
‘Health Care’ Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
148 | Newark, NJ | 34.45 | 123 | 98 | 95 | 140 |
149 | Worcester, MA | 32.85 | 120 | 136 | 138 | 122 |
150 | Providence, RI | 29.96 | 145 | 88 | 119 | 148 |
People plan for retirement at various stages of their lives. But regardless of one’s age, general wisdom has it that planning ahead and as early as possible can help secure a financially cozy retirement. To expand the discussion, we asked a panel of experts to share their advice on various factors that prospective retirees should consider as well as retirement-friendly measures that city leaders can implement. Click on the experts’ profiles to read their bios and responses to the following key questions:
- What financial factors should retirees take into consideration when deciding where to retire?
- What are some tips for living on a fixed income in retirement?
- What is the biggest mistake that people make when planning their retirements?
- What percentage of income should you aim to replace in retirement?
- In planning for retirement, what life expectancy should the average person use to make sure they have saved enough?
- In evaluating the best and worst cities to retire, what are the top five indicators?
- Should attracting more retirees be a priority for local government? If so, what should they do?
Jia Wu Associate Professor & Chairperson of the Department of Accounting & Finance, and Director of Master Science in Accounting Program in the Charlton College of Business at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
Wade Pfau Professor of Retirement Income in the Financial and Retirement Planning Doctoral Program at The American College of Financial Services
Teddi Jo Paulson Assistant Professor of Financial Planning at the University of Jamestown
Ryan Teeter Clinical Assistant Professor of Accounting Information Systems in the Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business at the University of Pittsburgh
Mariette O'Malley Partner at O'Malley & O'Malley LLP and Adjunct Professor at the University of Miami
Donald A. Hoy Associate Professor and Program Chair for Management at Benedictine College


- Availability of interesting leisure activities;
- Diverse transportation options;
- Access to quality health care;
- Agreeable climate and community;
- Access to family and friends;
- Ability to maintain social ties;
- Ability to age in place in your home;
- Housing prices;
- Costs of living and affordability of new location;
- State income taxes;
- State sales tax;
- State inheritance tax;
- Local property taxes and costs of municipal services;
- Other state tax rules regarding retirement income sources (e.g., Social Security).

- Proximity to family;
- Transportation into/out of city (airline, bus route, train);
- Entertainment options -- restaurants, movie theaters, theatre, golf, pickle ball;
- College community -- cultural events, library resources, sporting activities;
- Senior friendly -- nursing homes, assisted living facilities, memory care facilities, income assistance housing. Senior center with activities, food services -- meals on wheels;
- Fitness facilities with indoor walking, swimming, fitness classes.
- Look for free entertainment options. Utilize the senior center in your city, start or join a card club. Combine fitness and entertainment by joining a local fitness center. Look for a community garden plot.
- Sell your car. Focus on public transportation. Cities that focus on boosting their transportation systems help retirees live on less.
- Sell your home and rent something smaller. As individuals age, home maintenance becomes increasingly difficult. An otherwise appreciating asset (your home) can depreciate because of lack of maintenance. Interest rates are still very low, and this has helped keep real estate values high in many areas. The tax code also provides benefits for selling your home. An individual can exclude up to $250,000 in capital gain on the sale of their home, while a married couple can exclude up to $500,000 in capital gain. These gains can help fund your retirement.
- If you have minimal retirement assets and/or income, consider income-based apartments. Again, cities looking to attract retirees will focus on having income-assisted housing options.
- Your retirement is longer, so your savings must last longer;
- You have eliminated some of your peak earning years and, consequently, eliminated a large of amount annual savings into your retirement plan, including the matching contribution from your employer;
- You have eliminated a few years of growth in your retirement plan;
- You are drawing from a smaller accumulated amount;
- You have longer to cover your own health insurance. Medicare is not available for individuals until age 65, even though you could draw Social Security as early as age 62 (60 if you are a widow or widower). If you leave employment, lose your health insurance and expect to cover that cost on your own, you will significantly deplete your retirement savings on that cost alone. Depending on what happens with health care, working for an employer that provides health insurance, even for a few more years, might be your best option for retirement.



To help Americans find the best cities to spend their golden years, WalletHub’s analysts compared the retirement-friendliness of the 150 most populated U.S. cities across four key dimensions: 1) Affordability, 2) Activities, 3) Quality of Life and 4) Health Care.
We evaluated those dimensions using 40 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for retirement. For metrics marked with an asterisk (*), the square root of the population was used to calculate the population size in order to avoid overcompensating for minor differences across cities.
Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its total score and used the resulting scores to rank-order the cities in our sample. Our sample considers only the city proper in each case and excludes cities in the surrounding metro area.
With cost being a significant factor in retirement, our analysis assumes retirees will rely on a fixed income. The lower their expenses, the better retirees will fare in a particular city.
Affordability – Total Points: 25- Adjusted Cost of Living: Triple Weight (~10.71 Points)
- Taxpayer-Friendliness: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
- Retired Taxpayer-Friendliness: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
- Annual Cost of In-Home Services: Half Weight (~3.57 Points)
- Annual Cost of Adult Day Health Care: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
- Recreation & Senior Centers per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Fishing Facilities per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Public Golf Courses per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Museums per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Theaters per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Art Galleries per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Music Venues per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Bingo Halls per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Availability of Adult Volunteer Activities: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Recreation-Friendliness: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Share of Population Aged 65 & Older: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Elderly-Friendly Labor Market: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Age-Friendly Community: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Share of Population Aged 65 & Older Living Below Poverty Level: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Share of Population Aged 65 & Older Living Alone: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Walk Score: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Share of Population Aged 65 to 79 with Poor Transit Access: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Mild Weather: Double Weight (~3.57 Points)
- Caring Community: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Strength of Elder-Abuse Protections: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Violent-Crime Rate: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Property Crime Rate: Full Weight (~1.79 Points)
- Air Quality: Half Weight (~0.89 Points)
- Water Quality: Half Weight (~0.89 Points)
- Family & General Physicians per 10
- Dentists per 10
- Nurses per 1
- Health Care Facilities per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Quality of Public Hospital System: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Top-Rated Geriatrics Hospitals: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Emotional Health: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Share of Population Aged 65 & Older with a Disability: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Home-Care Facilities per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Life Expectancy: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
- Death Rate of Population Aged 65 & Older: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Council for Community and Economic Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Environmental Protection Agency, County Health Rankings, Social Science Research Council, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Retirement Living Information Center, Trust For Public Land, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Charity Navigator, Transportation For America, U.S. News & World Report, Yelp, Walk Score, AARP, Sharecare, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Genworth Financial and WalletHub research.
from Wallet HubWallet Hub
via Finance Xpress
0 comments