Posted by: Richie Bernardo
Anyone who’s ever organized a wedding knows all too well how demanding and protracted the process can be. It’s the reason couples hire professional event planners to do the heavy lifting — and also why the term “bridezilla” became a permanent entry in the wedding glossary.
Between sending invitations, securing reservations, planning a menu and obsessing over final touches on the cake, it’s no wonder the big day is arranged months, even years, in advance — and deservingly so. Tying the knot is a huge commitment, and the $60 billion wedding industry ain’t one to complain.
At WalletHub, we understand the logistical and financial stresses of that typically long march to “I do.” So in order to assist with the planning process, our data team compared the 150 biggest cities to find the cheapest and most convenient wedding destinations that also promise a memorable occasion. We examined each city across 20 key indicators of nuptial-friendliness, ranging from “average wedding cost” to “venues and event spaces per capita” to “hotel availability.” Read on for the winners, meaningful advice from wedding and marriage experts, and a full description of our methodology.
Main FindingsEmbed on your website<iframe src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/embed/18721/geochart-married.html" width="556" height="347" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe> <div style="width:556px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="http://ift.tt/2kmik8W;
Overall Rank |
City |
Total Score |
Effective |
Annual |
Difference |
Annual |
Adjusted |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Las Vegas, NV | 74.21 | 57 | 5 | 1 | ||
2 | Orlando, FL | 74.04 | 88 | 1 | 3 | ||
3 | Atlanta, GA | 69.99 | 64 | 2 | 9 | ||
4 | Tampa, FL | 65.43 | 41 | 11 | 5 | ||
5 | Cincinnati, OH | 64.63 | 27 | 8 | 27 | ||
6 | Scottsdale, AZ | 63.03 | 53 | 12 | 8 | ||
7 | Salt Lake City, UT | 62.92 | 92 | 3 | 22 | ||
8 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 60.83 | 65 | 10 | 16 | ||
9 | Knoxville, TN | 60.59 | 4 | 29 | 42 | ||
10 | Miami, FL | 60.55 | 99 | 6 | 11 | ||
11 | St. Louis, MO | 59.78 | 82 | 7 | 25 | ||
12 | New Orleans, LA | 59.67 | 58 | 27 | 10 | ||
13 | Springfield, MO | 57.81 | 3 | 40 | 45 | ||
14 | Boise, ID | 57.14 | 9 | 49 | 32 | ||
15 | Tucson, AZ | 56.94 | 28 | 64 | 14 | ||
16 | Birmingham, AL | 56.13 | 19 | 26 | 59 | ||
17 | Richmond, VA | 55.95 | 63 | 13 | 36 | ||
18 | Austin, TX | 55.62 | 91 | 17 | 20 | ||
19 | San Diego, CA | 55.04 | 118 | 18 | 4 | ||
20 | Tempe, AZ | 55.03 | 47 | 34 | 23 | ||
21 | Reno, NV | 54.53 | 77 | 28 | 24 | ||
22 | Albuquerque, NM | 54.26 | 15 | 96 | 26 | ||
23 | Portland, OR | 53.36 | 116 | 15 | 13 | ||
24 | Spokane, WA | 52.49 | 22 | 50 | 43 | ||
25 | Sacramento, CA | 52.48 | 121 | 14 | 15 | ||
26 | El Paso, TX | 52.13 | 1 | 141 | 99 | ||
27 | San Francisco, CA | 52.13 | 150 | 4 | 2 | ||
28 | Chattanooga, TN | 51.91 | 12 | 43 | 83 | ||
29 | Pittsburgh, PA | 51.74 | 102 | 21 | 30 | ||
30 | Denver, CO | 51.56 | 115 | 19 | 18 | ||
31 | Grand Rapids, MI | 51.37 | 32 | 31 | 73 | ||
32 | Seattle, WA | 51.24 | 125 | 16 | 12 | ||
33 | Baton Rouge, LA | 50.47 | 34 | 48 | 46 | ||
34 | Mobile, AL | 50.07 | 8 | 87 | 85 | ||
35 | Minneapolis, MN | 49.31 | 96 | 32 | 31 | ||
36 | Tulsa, OK | 49.18 | 20 | 98 | 47 | ||
37 | Honolulu, HI | 48.84 | 145 | 9 | 6 | ||
38 | St. Petersburg, FL | 48.73 | 44 | 72 | 40 | ||
39 | Los Angeles, CA | 48.06 | 128 | 35 | 7 | ||
40 | Modesto, CA | 47.90 | 93 | 36 | 35 | ||
41 | Kansas City, MO | 47.86 | 50 | 83 | 37 | ||
42 | Louisville, KY | 47.47 | 26 | 92 | 66 | ||
43 | Memphis, TN | 47.36 | 5 | 127 | 100 | ||
44 | Huntsville, AL | 46.76 | 33 | 85 | 67 | ||
45 | Omaha, NE | 46.74 | 40 | 78 | 53 | ||
46 | Houston, TX | 46.54 | 97 | 46 | 33 | ||
47 | Augusta, GA | 46.49 | 10 | 94 | 110 | ||
48 | Brownsville, TX | 46.47 | 2 | 148 | 146 | ||
49 | Tallahassee, FL | 46.03 | 62 | 47 | 64 | ||
50 | Phoenix, AZ | 45.98 | 51 | 109 | 38 | ||
51 | Shreveport, LA | 45.79 | 7 | 118 | 113 | ||
52 | Oklahoma City, OK | 45.76 | 30 | 116 | 61 | ||
53 | Madison, WI | 45.53 | 66 | 69 | 48 | ||
54 | Fayetteville, NC | 45.43 | 16 | 75 | 114 | ||
55 | Dallas, TX | 45.24 | 73 | 55 | 55 | ||
56 | San Antonio, TX | 44.84 | 54 | 76 | 60 | ||
57 | Rochester, NY | 44.69 | 117 | 23 | 58 | ||
58 | Nashville, TN | 44.56 | 69 | 57 | 68 | ||
59 | Colorado Springs, CO | 44.54 | 94 | 73 | 39 | ||
60 | Amarillo, TX | 44.46 | 31 | 113 | 91 | ||
61 | Bakersfield, CA | 44.45 | 84 | 62 | 52 | ||
62 | Raleigh, NC | 44.39 | 74 | 56 | 69 | ||
63 | Lubbock, TX | 44.32 | 18 | 88 | 120 | ||
64 | Anaheim, CA | 44.06 | 126 | 37 | 28 | ||
65 | Columbus, OH | 44.06 | 49 | 105 | 57 | ||
66 | Charlotte, NC | 43.94 | 39 | 93 | 88 | ||
67 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 43.78 | 35 | 124 | 78 | ||
68 | Columbus, GA | 43.67 | 13 | 114 | 119 | ||
69 | Overland Park, KS | 43.53 | 36 | 84 | 104 | ||
70 | Laredo, TX | 43.07 | 6 | 147 | 137 | ||
71 | Glendale, CA | 42.98 | 122 | 22 | 63 | ||
72 | Mesa, AZ | 42.96 | 47 | 104 | 75 | ||
73 | Buffalo, NY | 42.78 | 107 | 39 | 56 | ||
74 | Montgomery, AL | 42.75 | 11 | 117 | 135 | ||
75 | Cleveland, OH | 42.65 | 100 | 52 | 54 | ||
76 | Durham, NC | 42.45 | 60 | 81 | 89 | ||
77 | Jackson, MS | 42.34 | 21 | 111 | 123 | ||
78 | Little Rock, AR | 42.25 | 29 | 77 | 127 | ||
79 | Washington, DC | 41.92 | 143 | 30 | 17 | ||
80 | Chandler, AZ | 41.82 | 55 | 108 | 82 | ||
81 | Plano, TX | 41.62 | 81 | 66 | 95 | ||
82 | Greensboro, NC | 41.54 | 14 | 149 | 101 | ||
83 | Fresno, CA | 41.52 | 78 | 91 | 81 | ||
84 | Lincoln, NE | 41.45 | 68 | 82 | 96 | ||
85 | Henderson, NV | 41.42 | 61 | 126 | 71 | ||
86 | Norfolk, VA | 41.35 | 59 | 121 | 76 | ||
87 | Sioux Falls, SD | 41.32 | 43 | 95 | 107 | ||
88 | Wichita, KS | 41.25 | 23 | 120 | 118 | ||
89 | Chicago, IL | 41.09 | 131 | 58 | 29 | ||
90 | Corpus Christi, TX | 41.02 | 25 | 128 | 115 | ||
91 | Milwaukee, WI | 40.80 | 95 | 103 | 50 | ||
92 | Santa Rosa, CA | 40.67 | 132 | 20 | 74 | ||
93 | Indianapolis, IN | 40.66 | 46 | 145 | 79 | ||
94 | Vancouver, WA | 40.43 | 112 | 33 | 97 | ||
95 | Akron, OH | 39.93 | 42 | 97 | 121 | ||
96 | Jacksonville, FL | 39.84 | 87 | 110 | 77 | ||
97 | Fort Worth, TX | 39.78 | 79 | 107 | 87 | ||
98 | North Las Vegas, NV | 39.74 | 45 | 53 | 126 | ||
99 | Virginia Beach, VA | 39.63 | 98 | 90 | 72 | ||
100 | Tacoma, WA | 39.58 | 108 | 42 | 94 | ||
101 | Des Moines, IA | 39.51 | 76 | 79 | 109 | ||
102 | Detroit, MI | 39.42 | 67 | 140 | 80 | ||
103 | Toledo, OH | 39.42 | 17 | 138 | 138 | ||
104 | Long Beach, CA | 39.10 | 136 | 44 | 34 | ||
105 | Garden Grove, CA | 38.96 | 105 | 60 | 90 | ||
106 | Winston-Salem, NC | 38.95 | 24 | 150 | 103 | ||
107 | Glendale, AZ | 38.76 | 52 | 125 | 98 | ||
108 | St. Paul, MN | 38.73 | 103 | 71 | 93 | ||
109 | Fort Wayne, IN | 38.72 | 37 | 89 | 141 | ||
110 | Irving, TX | 38.37 | 71 | 67 | 128 | ||
111 | Irvine, CA | 38.22 | 127 | 38 | 70 | ||
112 | Baltimore, MD | 37.80 | 123 | 65 | 51 | ||
113 | Cape Coral, FL | 37.23 | 85 | 146 | 65 | ||
114 | Arlington, TX | 37.03 | 71 | 122 | 111 | ||
115 | Gilbert, AZ | 36.79 | 38 | 106 | 130 | ||
116 | Hialeah, FL | 36.48 | 80 | 102 | 122 | ||
117 | Newport News, VA | 36.16 | 75 | 131 | 116 | ||
118 | Huntington Beach, CA | 36.12 | 138 | 41 | 49 | ||
119 | Philadelphia, PA | 35.83 | 140 | 112 | 21 | ||
120 | Oakland, CA | 35.26 | 146 | 25 | 44 | ||
121 | Stockton, CA | 35.23 | 104 | 130 | 92 | ||
122 | Chesapeake, VA | 35.14 | 56 | 136 | 133 | ||
123 | Peoria, AZ | 35.07 | 86 | 133 | 112 | ||
124 | Oceanside, CA | 35.06 | 120 | 86 | 86 | ||
125 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 34.32 | 89 | 139 | 117 | ||
126 | San Jose, CA | 34.28 | 141 | 45 | 62 | ||
127 | New York, NY | 33.52 | 147 | 68 | 19 | ||
128 | Riverside, CA | 33.30 | 130 | 59 | 102 | ||
129 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 33.24 | 114 | 70 | 125 | ||
130 | Santa Ana, CA | 33.21 | 129 | 61 | 105 | ||
131 | San Bernardino, CA | 32.72 | 110 | 115 | 108 | ||
132 | Ontario, CA | 32.38 | 119 | 63 | 124 | ||
133 | Aurora, CO | 31.96 | 101 | 100 | 142 | ||
134 | Garland, TX | 31.87 | 90 | 135 | 139 | ||
135 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 31.48 | 83 | 142 | 148 | ||
136 | Chula Vista, CA | 31.40 | 109 | 80 | 144 | ||
137 | Providence, RI | 30.94 | 133 | 99 | 84 | ||
138 | Grand Prairie, TX | 30.75 | 70 | 144 | 140 | ||
139 | Anchorage, AK | 30.53 | 124 | 119 | 106 | ||
140 | Boston, MA | 30.15 | 149 | 54 | 41 | ||
141 | Fontana, CA | 27.78 | 110 | 132 | 147 | ||
142 | Aurora, IL | 25.92 | 106 | 137 | 149 | ||
143 | Jersey City, NJ | 25.91 | 139 | 74 | 132 | ||
144 | Moreno Valley, CA | 25.88 | 113 | 143 | 143 | ||
145 | Santa Clarita, CA | 25.77 | 134 | 101 | 131 | ||
146 | Fremont, CA | 25.70 | 142 | 51 | 136 | ||
147 | Oxnard, CA | 24.15 | 137 | 128 | 129 | ||
148 | Worcester, MA | 22.57 | 135 | 134 | 145 | ||
149 | Yonkers, NY | 21.00 | 148 | 24 | 150 | ||
150 | Newark, NJ | 20.31 | 144 | 123 | 134 |
Marriage is not only a big life decision, but it also can be a hefty financial commitment because money often dictates the extravagance and location of the wedding. But some couples have far fewer resources to dedicate for their special day. For advice on such matters and how to boost the local economy through the wedding business, we turned to a panel of experts in family studies, personal finance and local administration. Click on the experts’ profiles to read their bios and thoughts on the following key questions:
- How should a couple decide how much they should spend on a wedding?
- How should a couple decide where to get married?
- What tips do you have for a couple planning a wedding and hoping to stay on budget?
- Weddings can often be an economic boost to local businesses. What measures can local authorities undertake in order to stimulate weddings in their respective communities?
- Luke Erickson Personal finance Educator at University of Idaho Extension, Madison County
- Diane Margaret Joyal Research Coordinator at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Owner and Lead Designer of Bowerbird Flowers and Apothecary
- Dorris Perryman Assistant Professor of Accounting at Bristol Community College
- Cameron Gordon Associate Professor of Psychology at University of North Carolina, Wilmington
- Carolyn Washburn Family and Consumer Sciences Agent at Utah State University Extension
- Karl Andrew Pillemer Hazel E. Reed Professor of Human Development in the College of Human Ecology at Cornell University
- Karen J. Prager Professor of Psychology and Program Head for Gender Studies in the School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences at University of Texas at Dallas
- Dasha B. Marchetti Executive Director of Continuing Education and Professor of Business Studies at Bucks County Community College
- Let the other person have his or her say before interrupting;
- Avoid letting anger lead you to contemptuous remarks, like insults or sarcasm;
- Take at time out if you need it – not everything needs to be discussed until resolved; drop a contentious issue and come back to it.
In order to identify the best and worst cities in which to tie the knot, WalletHub’s analysts compared 150 of the most populated U.S. cities across three key dimensions: 1) Costs, 2) Facilities & Services and 3) Activities & Attractions.
We examined those dimensions using 20 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for weddings.
We then calculated the overall score for each city using its weighted average across all metrics and constructed the final ranking based on the resulting scores.
Costs – Total Points: 40- Average Wedding Cost: Triple Weight (~24.00 Points)
- Price of a Three-Star Hotel: Full Weight (~8.00 Points)
- Restaurant-Meal Costs: Full Weight (~8.00 Points)Note: “Restaurant Meal” refers to a three-course meal for two.
- Wedding Chapels & Churches per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Venues & Event Spaces per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Party-Equipment Rentals per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Event Planners per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Videographers & Photographers per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Musicians & DJs per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Makeup Artists & Hair Salons per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Bridal Shops per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Flower Shops per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Limousine Rentals per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s Best & Worst Foodie Cities ranking.
- Hotels per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s Cities with the Best & Worst Weather ranking.
- Restaurants & Bars per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s Most Fun Cities in America ranking.
- Number of Attractions: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)
- Popularity as a Travel Destination: Full Weight(~6.00 Points)
- Foodie-Friendliness: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)
- Weather: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)
- Amusement & Entertainment: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)
Sources: Data used to create these rankings were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Wedding Report, Kayak.com, Numbeo, Tripadvisor, Travbuddy.com, Yelp and WalletHub research.
from Wallet HubWallet Hub
via Finance Xpress
There are three major tax preparation software packages on the market that most do-it-yourself tax preparers will use – TurboTax, TaxACT and H&R Block. Comparing these three options to find the cheapest can be a real chore. Each has several editions with varying features. As a result, it is important to compare competing editions between the providers, not just to look simply at the lowest overall price that any seem to be offering.
What is vitally important in selecting the least expensive tax software is making sure that you get the right one based on your own individual income tax situation. Each of these providers has a very attractive “free” package. But with two of them, they charge for a state return. The one totally free option is only for very basic returns. It won’t help those who have a complex tax return.
To help you sort through this mess, let’s take a look at the offerings of all three companies, as well as the individual editions, and the charges related to each. Note that the costs listed below are for the online versions of each tax software. The cost for the downloadable versions is listed at the end of the article.
TurboTax
TurboTax is highly regarded in the self-prepared income tax universe, and it is the most popular tax software. But it has five different editions, and you have to choose the right one for your tax situation. Otherwise, you’ll need to upgrade.
Here are summaries of all five editions:
Free Edition
This version is for simple tax returns, such as Forms 1040EZ and 1040A. It is free for both federal (including the Earned Income Credit, or EIC) and state returns. There is also no fee paid to TurboTax, as the name implies, and no fee to e-file. But just in case you’re thinking this is the way to go, remember that this edition is very basic. Essentially, it does none of the work that TurboTax is so well-known for.
For example, it does not transfer your information from a previous year. It also doesn’t provide online access to all tax returns on file, or search for deductions and credits. Still, for simple returns, it is the only free option available.
Deluxe
This is TurboTax’s most popular edition, and it provides most of the services the product is known for. It is recommended if you have tax deductions, as the edition is specifically designed to maximize those deductions. The cost is $34.99, and the e-file is free. There is an additional charge of $36.99 for state returns (per state). So if you have to file in your state, you’re really looking at $71.98 – and that’s assuming you don’t have to file for more than one state. Check out the TurboTax Deluxe Edition here.
Premier
This is the TurboTax edition you will need if you have taxable investments or rental property. It does everything the Deluxe version does, but it adds sale of investment securities, automatic calculation of cost basis for investments sold, and preparation of Schedule E for rental properties. The cost is $54.99 and includes free e-file.
It has the same additional charge for preparation of your state return(s), at $36.99 per state. Plan that you’ll have to come up with $91.98 for this edition if you have to file in your state. Check out the TurboTax Premier Edition here.
Self-Employed
This edition does everything that the Premier edition does, but it also adds preparation of Schedule C (sole proprietors). It maximizes business tax deductions and depreciation, and also reports income and expenses from S-Corporations, C-Corporations, partnerships, and multi-member LLCs (but not the actual returns for each). The cost for this edition is $89.99 including free e-file. And once again, many of you will have to add in the per-state charge of $36.99, bringing the actual cost to $126.98. Check out the Self-Employed Edition here.
TurboTax Business
While TurboTax used to offer this edition in an online version, it is now software/download-only. They have instead improved the Self-Employed edition that I just mentioned, making it a viable option for even more filers. If you have a more complex return and need the Business edition, though, you will need to download it this year.
This is the edition for small businesses other than those using a Schedule C. It includes preparation of returns for small S-Corporations, C-Corporations, partnerships, estates, trusts, and multi-member LLCs (this is different from, and more complex than, the capabilities of the Self-Employed edition above).
So, if your business takes one of these forms, you’ll need this edition. The cost is $149.99, which includes free e-file, but once again there is a $36.99 per state charge. The true price is then $186.98.
Related: Do You Need a Sole Proprietorship, an S-Corp, or an LLC?
With each of the editions, you start the process for free and just pay when you are done and ready to file.
TaxACT
TaxACT works much the same way as TurboTax, in that it has multiple editions. In the past, it had a confusing array of editions and bundles. Recently, however, they have greatly simplified their production into three editions.
Free Federal. The free edition from TaxACT is limited to simple returns filed on Form 1040EZ and 1040A. It is free for both your federal and state returns. The free edition also includes free e-file with the IRS. Check out the TaxAct Free Edition here.
Plus: The next level up is ideal for home owners and investors, as well as those itemizing their deductions. It costs $27 for the federal return and $33 for the state return, bringing the total to $60. Check out the TaxAct Plus Edition here.
Premium: This edition is designed for those who are self-employed, contractors, or freelancers. It costs $37 for the federal return and $33 for a state return. Total cost for federal+state (assuming you’re only filing in one state)? $70. Check out the TaxAct Premium Edition here. Before buying either the Plus or Premium editions, however, you must like at the Ultimate Bundle.
Ultimate Bundle. TaxAct does something a bit odd with its pricing. After running through all of the above editions with different prices, it then offers all tax forms and includes both federal and state returns in one bundle that it appropriately calls its Ultimate Bundle. The cost–$29.99. And once again, e-file is free. So for those that aren’t filing a 1040EZ (where the free edition is available) and plan to file a state return, the Ultimate bundle is the way to go. Check out the TaxAct Ultimate Bundle here.
**Home and Business Bundles. TaxACT offers three separate bundles if you plan to download their software (versus using the online version). These include filing options for a 1065 partnership return, a 1120S Sub-S Corporation, or an 1120 (C Corporation) return, at just $99.99 for each bundle. Each includes the basic package from Deluxe Federal and one free e-file. That price includes both business and personal returns, and both federal and state returns.**
H&R Block
H&R Block has five editions, and you have to choose the one that most closely matches your tax profile.
More Zero Free Edition. H&R Block offers a “free” edition designed for simple returns and first-time tax filers. Like TurboTax and TaxAct, there is also no fee for a state return. Check out the H&R Block Free Edition here.
Deluxe. This edition is recommended for those with a more complicated return, such as freelancers. It has all the features of the Basic edition, as well as the ability to add freelance and independent contractor expenses (Schedule C-EZ). You can also store your return for up to 6 years with this edition. The cost of the package is $29.74. A state return adds $36.99 per state, so the total cost for this edition (federal and state) is $66.73. Check out the H&R Block Deluxe Edition here.
Premium. This edition has all the features of the Deluxe edition, but it is geared toward investors, small business owners, and investment property owners (Schedule E). The cost for the Premium edition is $46.74. As with the other editions, a state return will cost $36.99. The total cost for the federal and state package is $83.73. Check out the H&R Block Premium Edition here.
**Premium & Business. This edition is downloadable software (not an online edition, like the three listed above). It has all the features of the Premium edition, but is for preparation of corporate (S and C corporations), partnership, LLC, estates and trusts, and even non-profit income tax returns. It also produces payroll and employer forms, and unlimited business state program downloads. The cost for this edition is $62.97, and federal e-file is free. Check out the H&R Block Business Edition here.
Worth Mentioning…
There’s a newbie to the free online tax filing game this year, in the form of an already-popular credit checking company: Credit Karma. Their new program, called Credit Karma Tax, is guaranteed to be completely free for almost all filers. The only exceptions are those filing small business returns — those filing small business expenses, however, can still use the program. You can check out our review of Credit Karma Tax here, which is brand new for 2017 (tax year 2016).
In Summary
All three vendors above have very similar editions available based on your tax situation. There is a wide variation in what each charges for their plans. TurboTax is definitely the highest priced, while TaxACT is clearly the lowest and H&R Block rests comfortably in the middle. It may come down to which program you have used in the past, and are the most comfortable working with.
Here is a summary of the costs based on various tax situations:
TurboTax | H&R Block | TaxACT | |
---|---|---|---|
Simple Returns (Federal Only) |
FREE | FREE | FREE |
Simple Returns (Federal + 1 state) |
FREE | $9.99 | FREE |
Returns with Itemized Deductions (Federal + 1 State) |
$71.98 (Deluxe) |
$81.18 (Basic) |
$29.98 (Plus) |
Returns with Investments (Federal + 1 State) |
$91.98 (Premier) |
$89.68 (Deluxe) |
$29.98 (Plus) |
Returns for Real Estate Investors (Federal + 1 State) |
$91.98 (Premier) |
$102.43 (Premium) |
$29.98 (Plus) |
Returns with Self-Employed or Small Business Income (Federal + 1 State) |
$116.98 (Home & Business) |
$102.43 (Premium) |
$36.98 (Ultimate Bundle) |
Go to TurboTax | Go to H&R Block | Go to TaxACT |
Downloadable Versions
For those that don’t want to prepare their taxes online, downloadable versions of the tax software are available:
TurboTax: $29.99 to $99.99
TaxACT: Up to $70
H&R Block: $25.46 to $74.64 plus the cost of state returns and state e-file.
Topics: Podcast • TaxesThe post The Cheapest Tax Software of 2017–TurboTax vs TaxAct vs H&R Block appeared first on The Dough Roller.
via Finance Xpress
Posted by: John S Kiernan
While the Roman numerals may take some getting used to, Super Bowl LI (51) is largely characterized by familiarities, as Tom Brady, Bill Belichick and the New England Patriots make their seventh run at the Lombardi Trophy since 2002 in the big game’s third trip to Space City. As usual, millions of people will tune in on television. And we’ll again consume more than a billion chicken wings while advertisers spend billions of dollars trying to curry our favor during uniquely popular commercial breaks. Lurking behind the standard hoopla, however, are an upstart and an unanswered question.
The Atlanta Falcons are set to make just their second Super Bowl appearance, finally equaling the number of times their hometown has hosted the event. But do they have what it takes to bring down the Patriots? Or will they end up looking like a bunch of modern-day Benedict Arnolds, betraying the hopes of their fans with a loss on the field?
Only time will tell which team winds up going to Disneyland, as they say. But we can certainly get you prepared for the action in the meantime. Below, you’ll find an awesome infographic with our favorite factoids and tidbits about Super Bowl LI, plus a Q&A with a panel of leading sports business experts. Enjoy the game!
{article_social_buttons}
Embed on your website<a href="http://ift.tt/2kFeEw6; <img src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/images/posts/18920/super-bowl-50_infographic_0201161.png" width="700" height="5598" alt="super-bowl-50_Infographic_020116" /> </a> <div style="width:700px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="http://ift.tt/2kiTzd7; Ask the ExpertsFor additional insight into the business of the big game, and the NFL more generally, we posed the following questions to a panel of leading experts. You can check out their bios and responses below.
- Who's your pick to win?
- What kind of economic impact do you expect hosting the Super Bowl to have on San Francisco Bay Area?
- What trends do you expect from the commercials this year? Is Super Bowl ad time an effective investment for companies?
- How many Super Bowls do you ultimately expect there to be? What are the biggest issues facing the future of the league?
- Raymond Sauer Professor and Chair of the John E. Walker Department of Economics at Clemson University
- Tim Groseclose Professor in the Department of Economics and Adam Smith Chair in the Mercatus Center at George Mason University
- Brian Larson Director of Sport Management and Associate Professor of Marketing in the School of Business Administration at Widener University
- Kevin W. Downer Director of Sport Management and Assistant Professor of Exercise and Sport Science at Bluefield College
- Anthony G. Weaver Chair and Associate Professor in the Department of Sport & Event Management at Elon University
- Vassilis Dalakas Professor of Marketing in the College of Business Administration at California State University San Marcos
- Brandon Brown Assistant Professor in the Department of Sport Management at University of Tampa
- Peter A. Carfagna Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School, and CEO of Magis, LLC
from Wallet HubWallet Hub
via Finance Xpress
Posted by: Richie Bernardo
To call yourself a true fan of football is to acknowledge that the sport is more than a game: it’s a sacred American tradition. You’re not just a spectator but also a participant. You don’t just proudly wear your team’s jersey, perfect your game-day chili or tailgate with fellow fans. You must roar like an American when your team scores a touchdown — or express supreme dismay when their asses are handed to them on a platter.
But to show your passion for the sport, you need the best seats in the house. With Super Bowl LI upon us, WalletHub’s number crunchers compared 244 U.S. cities with at least one college or professional football team across 17 key metrics. Our data set ranges from “number of NFL and college football teams” to “average ticket price for an NFL game” to “fan friendliness.” Read on for the winners, expert sports commentary and a full description of how we ranked the cities. For fun and interesting facts about the biggest sporting event of the year, make sure to check out WalletHub’s Super Bowl LI By The Numbers infographic.
Main FindingsEmbed on your website<iframe src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/embed/9691/geochart-sportfans.html" width="556" height="347" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe> <div style="width:556px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="http://ift.tt/2juCNUv;
Best Football Cities for Fans
Overall Rank |
City |
Total Score |
‘NFL’ Rank |
‘NCAA (FBS & FCS)’ Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Green Bay, WI | 63.69 | 1 | 235 |
2 | Pittsburgh, PA | 50.45 | 2 | 4 |
3 | New York, NY | 43.30 | 4 | 18 |
4 | Dallas, TX | 41.04 | 3 | 235 |
5 | Boston, MA | 39.91 | 5 | 120 |
6 | Seattle, WA | 39.28 | 9 | 71 |
7 | Philadelphia, PA | 39.18 | 17 | 3 |
8 | Indianapolis, IN | 38.44 | 7 | 138 |
9 | Glendale, AZ | 36.94 | 6 | 235 |
10 | Minneapolis, MN | 36.82 | 14 | 31 |
11 | Atlanta, GA | 36.48 | 16 | 22 |
12 | Kansas City, MO | 36.41 | 8 | 235 |
13 | Houston, TX | 36.07 | 24 | 7 |
14 | Charlotte, NC | 35.50 | 12 | 174 |
15 | Miami, FL | 35.29 | 19 | 27 |
16 | Denver, CO | 35.24 | 10 | 235 |
17 | Oakland, CA | 34.45 | 11 | 235 |
18 | Nashville, TN | 33.34 | 23 | 74 |
19 | Tampa, FL | 33.29 | 26 | 61 |
20 | Cleveland, OH | 32.94 | 13 | 235 |
21 | Buffalo, NY | 32.89 | 20 | 150 |
22 | Los Angeles, CA | 32.57 | 21 | 145 |
23 | New Orleans, LA | 32.07 | 18 | 192 |
24 | San Diego, CA | 32.05 | 31 | 8 |
25 | Washington, DC | 31.81 | 30 | 66 |
26 | Cincinnati, OH | 31.65 | 15 | 214 |
27 | Baltimore, MD | 31.20 | 28 | 139 |
28 | Clemson, SC | 30.42 | 32 | 1 |
29 | Tuscaloosa, AL | 30.32 | 32 | 2 |
30 | Jacksonville, FL | 29.49 | 29 | 200 |
31 | San Francisco, CA | 29.21 | 22 | 235 |
32 | Chicago, IL | 28.72 | 25 | 235 |
33 | Detroit, MI | 28.60 | 27 | 235 |
34 | Fayette, MS | 23.24 | 32 | 5 |
35 | Baton Rouge, LA | 23.06 | 32 | 6 |
36 | Cambridge, MA | 21.54 | 32 | 9 |
37 | Tallahassee, FL | 21.49 | 32 | 10 |
38 | Gainesville, FL | 21.40 | 32 | 11 |
39 | Athens, GA | 21.00 | 32 | 13 |
40 | Chapel Hill, NC | 20.92 | 32 | 14 |
41 | Huntington, WV | 20.83 | 32 | 15 |
42 | Fargo, ND | 20.73 | 32 | 16 |
43 | DeKalb, IL | 20.69 | 32 | 17 |
44 | State College, PA | 20.37 | 32 | 19 |
45 | Toledo, OH | 20.29 | 32 | 20 |
46 | Lincoln, NE | 20.17 | 32 | 23 |
47 | Jacksonville, AL | 20.10 | 32 | 24 |
48 | Grambling, LA | 19.78 | 32 | 25 |
49 | Dayton, OH | 19.65 | 32 | 26 |
50 | Princeton, NJ | 19.61 | 32 | 12 |
51 | Boise, ID | 19.40 | 32 | 28 |
52 | Boone, NC | 19.38 | 32 | 29 |
53 | Eugene, OR | 19.36 | 32 | 30 |
54 | Huntsville, TX | 19.22 | 32 | 32 |
55 | Durham, NC | 19.20 | 32 | 33 |
56 | Statesboro, GA | 19.17 | 32 | 34 |
57 | Hanover, NH | 19.08 | 32 | 35 |
58 | Harrisonburg, VA | 19.00 | 32 | 36 |
59 | Conway, SC | 18.97 | 32 | 38 |
60 | Bowling Green, KY | 18.88 | 32 | 40 |
61 | Norman, OK | 18.85 | 32 | 41 |
62 | Madison, WI | 18.75 | 32 | 42 |
63 | Cheney, WA | 18.72 | 32 | 43 |
64 | Ruston, LA | 18.62 | 32 | 44 |
65 | New Haven, CT | 18.62 | 32 | 21 |
66 | Annapolis, MD | 18.53 | 32 | 45 |
67 | Bowling Green, OH | 18.50 | 32 | 46 |
68 | Conway, AR | 18.49 | 32 | 47 |
69 | West Point, NY | 18.47 | 32 | 48 |
70 | Durham, NH | 18.34 | 32 | 50 |
71 | Norfolk, VA | 18.31 | 32 | 51 |
72 | Fayetteville, AR | 18.31 | 32 | 52 |
73 | Hamilton, NY | 18.29 | 32 | 53 |
74 | Prairie View, TX | 18.27 | 32 | 54 |
75 | Morgantown, WV | 18.26 | 32 | 55 |
76 | Youngstown, OH | 18.23 | 32 | 56 |
77 | Lake Charles, LA | 18.18 | 32 | 57 |
78 | Knoxville, TN | 18.13 | 32 | 58 |
79 | Provo, UT | 18.12 | 32 | 59 |
80 | Normal, IL | 17.97 | 32 | 60 |
81 | Stillwater, OK | 17.96 | 32 | 63 |
81 | Athens, OH | 17.96 | 32 | 62 |
83 | Colorado Springs, CO | 17.93 | 32 | 64 |
84 | Chattanooga, TN | 17.89 | 32 | 65 |
85 | Mount Pleasant, MI | 17.86 | 32 | 67 |
86 | Waco, TX | 17.85 | 32 | 68 |
87 | Fort Worth, TX | 17.84 | 32 | 69 |
88 | Richmond, VA | 17.82 | 32 | 70 |
89 | Jonesboro, AR | 17.74 | 32 | 72 |
90 | Memphis, TN | 17.74 | 32 | 73 |
91 | Brookings, SD | 17.55 | 32 | 75 |
92 | Ann Arbor, MI | 17.47 | 32 | 37 |
93 | Grand Forks, ND | 17.41 | 32 | 76 |
94 | East Lansing, MI | 17.39 | 32 | 39 |
95 | Martin, TN | 17.19 | 32 | 77 |
96 | Orangeburg, SC | 17.15 | 32 | 78 |
97 | Richmond, KY | 17.14 | 32 | 79 |
98 | Williamsburg, VA | 17.11 | 32 | 80 |
99 | Lewisburg, PA | 16.98 | 32 | 81 |
100 | Birmingham, AL | 16.98 | 32 | 82 |
101 | Charleston, SC | 16.96 | 32 | 83 |
102 | Columbus, OH | 16.94 | 32 | 49 |
103 | Pasadena, CA | 16.94 | 32 | 84 |
104 | Champaign, IL | 16.94 | 32 | 85 |
105 | Des Moines, IA | 16.87 | 32 | 86 |
106 | Louisville, KY | 16.84 | 32 | 87 |
107 | Iowa City, IA | 16.81 | 32 | 88 |
108 | Smithfield, RI | 16.81 | 32 | 89 |
109 | Spartanburg, SC | 16.77 | 32 | 90 |
110 | Hammond, LA | 16.75 | 32 | 91 |
111 | Cullowhee, NC | 16.73 | 32 | 92 |
112 | Oxford, OH | 16.72 | 32 | 93 |
113 | Boulder, CO | 16.72 | 32 | 94 |
114 | Akron, OH | 16.70 | 32 | 96 |
115 | Missoula, MT | 16.63 | 32 | 97 |
116 | Kennesaw, GA | 16.63 | 32 | 98 |
117 | West Long Branch, NJ | 16.61 | 32 | 99 |
118 | Tempe, AZ | 16.58 | 32 | 100 |
119 | San Antonio, TX | 16.53 | 32 | 101 |
120 | Murfreesboro, TN | 16.53 | 32 | 102 |
121 | Manhattan, KS | 16.51 | 32 | 103 |
122 | Macomb, IL | 16.50 | 32 | 104 |
123 | Evanston, IL | 16.46 | 32 | 105 |
124 | Flagstaff, AZ | 16.44 | 32 | 106 |
125 | Bethlehem, PA | 16.43 | 32 | 107 |
126 | Troy, AL | 16.37 | 32 | 108 |
127 | Charleston, IL | 16.34 | 32 | 109 |
128 | San Luis Obispo, CA | 16.30 | 32 | 110 |
129 | Logan, UT | 16.30 | 32 | 111 |
130 | Tucson, AZ | 16.29 | 32 | 112 |
131 | College Park, MD | 16.24 | 32 | 113 |
132 | Cedar City, UT | 16.19 | 32 | 114 |
133 | Berkeley, CA | 16.15 | 32 | 115 |
134 | Nacogdoches, TX | 16.11 | 32 | 116 |
135 | Albuquerque, NM | 16.11 | 32 | 117 |
136 | Abilene, TX | 16.04 | 32 | 119 |
137 | Piscatawayship, NJ | 15.98 | 32 | 121 |
138 | Reno, NV | 15.96 | 32 | 122 |
139 | Beaumont, TX | 15.95 | 32 | 123 |
140 | Orono, ME | 15.95 | 32 | 124 |
141 | Terre Haute, IN | 15.94 | 32 | 125 |
142 | Macon, GA | 15.90 | 32 | 126 |
142 | Pullman, WA | 15.90 | 32 | 126 |
144 | Orlando, FL | 15.90 | 32 | 128 |
145 | Lafayette, LA | 15.81 | 32 | 130 |
146 | Austin, TX | 15.80 | 32 | 131 |
147 | Providence, RI | 15.79 | 32 | 132 |
148 | Greeley, CO | 15.74 | 32 | 133 |
149 | Tulsa, OK | 15.72 | 32 | 134 |
150 | Cookeville, TN | 15.66 | 32 | 135 |
151 | University Park, TX | 15.55 | 32 | 136 |
152 | Poughkeepsie, NY | 15.53 | 32 | 137 |
153 | Boiling Springs, NC | 15.44 | 32 | 140 |
154 | Towson, MD | 15.44 | 32 | 141 |
155 | Carbondale, IL | 15.42 | 32 | 142 |
156 | Ithaca, NY | 15.42 | 32 | 143 |
157 | El Paso, TX | 15.40 | 32 | 144 |
158 | Stanford, CA | 15.37 | 32 | 95 |
159 | Greenville, NC | 15.25 | 32 | 146 |
160 | Lexington, KY | 15.20 | 32 | 147 |
161 | Lubbock, TX | 15.17 | 32 | 148 |
162 | Hampton, VA | 15.03 | 32 | 149 |
163 | Pocatello, ID | 14.93 | 32 | 151 |
164 | Natchitoches, LA | 14.90 | 32 | 152 |
165 | Easton, PA | 14.79 | 32 | 153 |
166 | Auburn, AL | 14.77 | 32 | 118 |
167 | Raleigh, NC | 14.75 | 32 | 154 |
168 | Murray, KY | 14.68 | 32 | 155 |
169 | Greenville, SC | 14.67 | 32 | 156 |
170 | San Marcos, TX | 14.66 | 32 | 157 |
171 | Clinton, SC | 14.65 | 32 | 158 |
172 | San Jose, CA | 14.55 | 32 | 159 |
173 | Oxford, MS | 14.55 | 32 | 129 |
174 | Jackson, MS | 14.55 | 32 | 160 |
175 | Vermillion, SD | 14.54 | 32 | 161 |
176 | Columbia, SC | 14.53 | 32 | 162 |
177 | Honolulu, HI | 14.49 | 32 | 163 |
178 | Ypsilanti, MI | 14.42 | 32 | 164 |
179 | Sacramento, CA | 14.42 | 32 | 165 |
180 | Syracuse, NY | 14.42 | 32 | 166 |
181 | Monroe, LA | 14.37 | 32 | 167 |
182 | Elon, NC | 14.34 | 32 | 168 |
183 | Winston-Salem, NC | 14.33 | 32 | 169 |
184 | Charlottesville, VA | 14.26 | 32 | 170 |
184 | Itta Bena, MS | 14.26 | 32 | 170 |
186 | Johnson City, TN | 14.26 | 32 | 172 |
187 | Kent, OH | 14.25 | 32 | 173 |
188 | Denton, TX | 14.05 | 32 | 175 |
189 | West Lafayette, IN | 14.03 | 32 | 176 |
190 | Springfield, MO | 14.02 | 32 | 178 |
191 | Corvallis, OR | 14.00 | 32 | 179 |
192 | Huntsville, AL | 13.99 | 32 | 180 |
193 | Fresno, CA | 13.96 | 32 | 181 |
194 | Boca Raton, FL | 13.93 | 32 | 182 |
195 | Thibodaux, LA | 13.86 | 32 | 183 |
196 | Morehead, KY | 13.78 | 32 | 184 |
197 | Portland, OR | 13.77 | 32 | 185 |
197 | Ames, IA | 13.77 | 32 | 185 |
199 | South Bend, IN | 13.74 | 32 | 187 |
200 | Las Cruces, NM | 13.73 | 32 | 188 |
201 | Davis, CA | 13.57 | 32 | 189 |
202 | Las Vegas, NV | 13.50 | 32 | 190 |
203 | Kingston, RI | 13.02 | 32 | 193 |
204 | Starkville, MS | 12.90 | 32 | 177 |
205 | Savannah, GA | 12.76 | 32 | 196 |
206 | College Station, TX | 12.27 | 32 | 191 |
207 | Lawrence, KS | 12.07 | 32 | 197 |
208 | Dover, DE | 11.91 | 32 | 198 |
209 | Clarksville, TN | 11.88 | 32 | 199 |
210 | Kalamazoo, MI | 11.82 | 32 | 194 |
211 | Greensboro, NC | 11.78 | 32 | 195 |
212 | Salt Lake City, UT | 10.64 | 32 | 201 |
213 | Loretto, PA | 10.48 | 32 | 202 |
214 | Columbia, MO | 10.25 | 32 | 203 |
215 | North Charleston, SC | 10.00 | 32 | 204 |
216 | Blacksburg, VA | 9.83 | 32 | 205 |
217 | Daytona Beach, FL | 9.47 | 32 | 206 |
218 | Newark, DE | 9.41 | 32 | 207 |
219 | Fairfield, CT | 9.36 | 32 | 208 |
220 | Fort Collins, CO | 9.10 | 32 | 209 |
221 | Cedar Falls, IA | 9.01 | 32 | 210 |
222 | Bozeman, MT | 8.87 | 32 | 211 |
223 | Lynchburg, VA | 8.72 | 32 | 212 |
224 | Buies Creek, NC | 8.55 | 32 | 213 |
225 | Hattiesburg, MS | 7.95 | 32 | 215 |
226 | Laramie, WY | 7.81 | 32 | 216 |
227 | Montgomery, AL | 7.79 | 32 | 217 |
228 | Albany, NY | 7.78 | 32 | 218 |
229 | Stony Brook, NY | 7.62 | 32 | 219 |
230 | Bloomington, IN | 7.34 | 32 | 220 |
231 | Muncie, IN | 7.33 | 32 | 221 |
232 | Mobile, AL | 7.31 | 32 | 222 |
233 | Ogden, UT | 7.14 | 32 | 223 |
234 | Moscow, ID | 6.96 | 32 | 224 |
235 | Worcester, MA | 6.92 | 32 | 225 |
236 | DeLand, FL | 6.36 | 32 | 226 |
237 | Cape Girardeau, MO | 6.35 | 32 | 227 |
238 | Valparaiso, IN | 6.07 | 32 | 228 |
239 | East Hartford, CT | 6.03 | 32 | 229 |
240 | Amherst, MA | 5.74 | 32 | 230 |
241 | Lexington, VA | 5.50 | 32 | 231 |
242 | New Britain, CT | 5.37 | 32 | 232 |
243 | Pine Bluff, AR | 4.91 | 32 | 233 |
244 | Davidson, NC | 4.33 | 32 | 234 |
Rank |
Large City (Score) |
Rank |
Midsize City (Score) |
Rank |
Small City (Score) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Pittsburgh, PA (50.45) | 1 | Glendale, AZ (36.94) | 1 | Green Bay, WI (63.69) | |||
2 | New York, NY (43.30) | 2 | Buffalo, NY (32.89) | 2 | Clemson, SC (30.42) | |||
3 | Dallas, TX (41.04) | 3 | Cincinnati, OH (31.65) | 3 | Tuscaloosa, AL (30.32) | |||
4 | Boston, MA (39.91) | 4 | Baton Rouge, LA (23.06) | 4 | Fayette, MS (23.24) | |||
5 | Seattle, WA (39.28) | 5 | Tallahassee, FL (21.49) | 5 | Cambridge, MA (21.54) | |||
6 | Philadelphia, PA (39.18) | 6 | Gainesville, FL (21.40) | 6 | Athens, GA (21.00) | |||
7 | Indianapolis, IN (38.44) | 7 | Toledo, OH (20.29) | 7 | Chapel Hill, NC (20.92) | |||
8 | Minneapolis, MN (36.82) | 8 | Lincoln, NE (20.17) | 8 | Huntington, WV (20.83) | |||
9 | Atlanta, GA (36.48) | 9 | Dayton, OH (19.65) | 9 | Fargo, ND (20.73) | |||
10 | Kansas City, MO (36.41) | 10 | Boise, ID (19.40) | 10 | DeKalb, IL (20.69) | |||
11 | Houston, TX (36.07) | 11 | Eugene, OR (19.36) | 11 | State College, PA (20.37) | |||
12 | Charlotte, NC (35.50) | 12 | Durham, NC (19.20) | 12 | Jacksonville, AL (20.10) | |||
13 | Miami, FL (35.29) | 13 | Madison, WI (18.75) | 13 | Grambling, LA (19.78) | |||
14 | Denver, CO (35.24) | 14 | New Haven, CT (18.62) | 14 | Princeton, NJ (19.61) | |||
15 | Oakland, CA (34.45) | 15 | Norfolk, VA (18.31) | 15 | Boone, NC (19.38) | |||
16 | Nashville, TN (33.34) | 16 | Knoxville, TN (18.13) | 16 | Huntsville, TX (19.22) | |||
17 | Tampa, FL (33.29) | 17 | Chattanooga, TN (17.89) | 17 | Statesboro, GA (19.17) | |||
18 | Cleveland, OH (32.94) | 18 | Waco, TX (17.85) | 18 | Hanover, NH (19.08) | |||
19 | Los Angeles, CA (32.57) | 19 | Richmond, VA (17.82) | 19 | Harrisonburg, VA (19.00) | |||
20 | New Orleans, LA (32.07) | 20 | Birmingham, AL (16.98) | 20 | Conway, SC (18.97) | |||
21 | San Diego, CA (32.05) | 21 | Charleston, SC (16.96) | 21 | Bowling Green, KY (18.88) | |||
22 | Washington, DC (31.81) | 22 | Pasadena, CA (16.94) | 22 | Norman, OK (18.85) | |||
23 | Baltimore, MD (31.20) | 23 | Des Moines, IA (16.87) | 23 | Cheney, WA (18.72) | |||
24 | Jacksonville, FL (29.49) | 24 | Akron, OH (16.70) | 24 | Ruston, LA (18.62) | |||
25 | San Francisco, CA (29.21) | 25 | Tempe, AZ (16.58) | 25 | Annapolis, MD (18.53) | |||
26 | Chicago, IL (28.72) | 26 | Reno, NV (15.96) | 26 | Bowling Green, OH (18.50) | |||
27 | Detroit, MI (28.60) | 27 | Macon, GA (15.90) | 27 | Conway, AR (18.49) | |||
28 | Colorado Springs, CO (17.93) | 28 | Orlando, FL (15.90) | 28 | West Point, NY (18.47) | |||
29 | Fort Worth, TX (17.84) | 29 | Providence, RI (15.79) | 29 | Durham, NH (18.34) | |||
30 | Memphis, TN (17.74) | 30 | Lubbock, TX (15.17) | 30 | Fayetteville, AR (18.31) | |||
31 | Columbus, OH (16.94) | 31 | Hampton, VA (15.03) | 31 | Hamilton, NY (18.29) | |||
32 | Louisville, KY (16.84) | 32 | Jackson, MS (14.55) | 32 | Prairie View, TX (18.27) | |||
33 | San Antonio, TX (16.53) | 33 | Columbia, SC (14.53) | 33 | Morgantown, WV (18.26) | |||
34 | Tucson, AZ (16.29) | 34 | Syracuse, NY (14.42) | 34 | Youngstown, OH (18.23) | |||
35 | Albuquerque, NM (16.11) | 35 | Winston-Salem, NC (14.33) | 35 | Lake Charles, LA (18.18) | |||
36 | Austin, TX (15.80) | 36 | Denton, TX (14.05) | 36 | Provo, UT (18.12) | |||
37 | Tulsa, OK (15.72) | 37 | Springfield, MO (14.02) | 37 | Normal, IL (17.97) | |||
38 | El Paso, TX (15.40) | 38 | Huntsville, AL (13.99) | 38 | Stillwater, OK (17.96) | |||
39 | Lexington, KY (15.20) | 39 | Savannah, GA (12.76) | 38 | Athens, OH (17.96) | |||
40 | Raleigh, NC (14.75) | 40 | Clarksville, TN (11.88) | 40 | Mount Pleasant, MI (17.86) | |||
41 | San Jose, CA (14.55) | 41 | Greensboro, NC (11.78) | 41 | Jonesboro, AR (17.74) | |||
42 | Honolulu, HI (14.49) | 42 | Salt Lake City, UT (10.64) | 42 | Brookings, SD (17.55) | |||
43 | Sacramento, CA (14.42) | 43 | Fort Collins, CO (9.10) | 43 | Ann Arbor, MI (17.47) | |||
44 | Fresno, CA (13.96) | 44 | Montgomery, AL (7.79) | 44 | Grand Forks, ND (17.41) | |||
45 | Portland, OR (13.77) | 45 | Mobile, AL (7.31) | 45 | East Lansing, MI (17.39) | |||
46 | Las Vegas, NV (13.50) | 46 | Worcester, MA (6.92) | 46 | Martin, TN (17.19) | |||
47 | Orangeburg, SC (17.15) | |||||||
48 | Richmond, KY (17.14) | |||||||
49 | Williamsburg, VA (17.11) | |||||||
50 | Lewisburg, PA (16.98) | |||||||
51 | Champaign, IL (16.94) | |||||||
52 | Iowa City, IA (16.81) | |||||||
53 | Smithfield, RI (16.81) | |||||||
54 | Spartanburg, SC (16.77) | |||||||
55 | Hammond, LA (16.75) | |||||||
56 | Cullowhee, NC (16.73) | |||||||
57 | Oxford, OH (16.72) | |||||||
58 | Boulder, CO (16.72) | |||||||
59 | Missoula, MT (16.63) | |||||||
60 | Kennesaw, GA (16.63) | |||||||
61 | West Long Branch, NJ (16.61) | |||||||
62 | Murfreesboro, TN (16.53) | |||||||
63 | Manhattan, KS (16.51) | |||||||
64 | Macomb, IL (16.50) | |||||||
65 | Evanston, IL (16.46) | |||||||
66 | Flagstaff, AZ (16.44) | |||||||
67 | Bethlehem, PA (16.43) | |||||||
68 | Troy, AL (16.37) | |||||||
69 | Charleston, IL (16.34) | |||||||
70 | San Luis Obispo, CA (16.30) | |||||||
71 | Logan, UT (16.30) | |||||||
72 | College Park, MD (16.24) | |||||||
73 | Cedar City, UT (16.19) | |||||||
74 | Berkeley, CA (16.15) | |||||||
75 | Nacogdoches, TX (16.11) | |||||||
76 | Abilene, TX (16.04) | |||||||
77 | Piscatawayship, NJ (15.98) | |||||||
78 | Beaumont, TX (15.95) | |||||||
79 | Orono, ME (15.95) | |||||||
80 | Terre Haute, IN (15.94) | |||||||
81 | Pullman, WA (15.90) | |||||||
82 | Lafayette, LA (15.81) | |||||||
83 | Greeley, CO (15.74) | |||||||
84 | Cookeville, TN (15.66) | |||||||
85 | University Park, TX (15.55) | |||||||
86 | Poughkeepsie, NY (15.53) | |||||||
87 | Boiling Springs, NC (15.44) | |||||||
88 | Towson, MD (15.44) | |||||||
89 | Carbondale, IL (15.42) | |||||||
90 | Ithaca, NY (15.42) | |||||||
91 | Stanford, CA (15.37) | |||||||
92 | Greenville, NC (15.25) | |||||||
93 | Pocatello, ID (14.93) | |||||||
94 | Natchitoches, LA (14.90) | |||||||
95 | Easton, PA (14.79) | |||||||
96 | Auburn, AL (14.77) | |||||||
97 | Murray, KY (14.68) | |||||||
98 | Greenville, SC (14.67) | |||||||
99 | San Marcos, TX (14.66) | |||||||
100 | Clinton, SC (14.65) | |||||||
101 | Oxford, MS (14.55) | |||||||
102 | Vermillion, SD (14.54) | |||||||
103 | Ypsilanti, MI (14.42) | |||||||
104 | Monroe, LA (14.37) | |||||||
105 | Elon, NC (14.34) | |||||||
106 | Charlottesville, VA (14.26) | |||||||
106 | Itta Bena, MS (14.26) | |||||||
108 | Johnson City, TN (14.26) | |||||||
109 | Kent, OH (14.25) | |||||||
110 | West Lafayette, IN (14.03) | |||||||
111 | Corvallis, OR (14.00) | |||||||
112 | Boca Raton, FL (13.93) | |||||||
113 | Thibodaux, LA (13.86) | |||||||
114 | Morehead, KY (13.78) | |||||||
115 | Ames, IA (13.77) | |||||||
116 | South Bend, IN (13.74) | |||||||
117 | Las Cruces, NM (13.73) | |||||||
118 | Davis, CA (13.57) | |||||||
119 | Kingston, RI (13.02) | |||||||
120 | Starkville, MS (12.90) | |||||||
121 | College Station, TX (12.27) | |||||||
122 | Lawrence, KS (12.07) | |||||||
123 | Dover, DE (11.91) | |||||||
124 | Kalamazoo, MI (11.82) | |||||||
125 | Loretto, PA (10.48) | |||||||
126 | Columbia, MO (10.25) | |||||||
127 | North Charleston, SC (10.00) | |||||||
128 | Blacksburg, VA (9.83) | |||||||
129 | Daytona Beach, FL (9.47) | |||||||
130 | Newark, DE (9.41) | |||||||
131 | Fairfield, CT (9.36) | |||||||
132 | Cedar Falls, IA (9.01) | |||||||
133 | Bozeman, MT (8.87) | |||||||
134 | Lynchburg, VA (8.72) | |||||||
135 | Buies Creek, NC (8.55) | |||||||
136 | Hattiesburg, MS (7.95) | |||||||
137 | Laramie, WY (7.81) | |||||||
138 | Albany, NY (7.78) | |||||||
139 | Stony Brook, NY (7.62) | |||||||
140 | Bloomington, IN (7.34) | |||||||
141 | Muncie, IN (7.33) | |||||||
142 | Ogden, UT (7.14) | |||||||
143 | Moscow, ID (6.96) | |||||||
144 | DeLand, FL (6.36) | |||||||
145 | Cape Girardeau, MO (6.35) | |||||||
146 | Valparaiso, IN (6.07) | |||||||
147 | East Hartford, CT (6.03) | |||||||
148 | Amherst, MA (5.74) | |||||||
149 | Lexington, VA (5.50) | |||||||
150 | New Britain, CT (5.37) | |||||||
151 | Pine Bluff, AR (4.91) | |||||||
152 | Davidson, NC (4.33) |
Certain qualities make a city a good environment for football fans. For more insight, we asked a panel of experts to weigh in with their thoughts on the following key questions:
- What are the biggest challenges facing professional football today?
- How can the game be adapted to better ensure the long-term health and safety of players?
- What makes a good football fan?
- What are some strategies for fans to enjoy watching football — at home, in a bar or at the stadium, for instance — without breaking the bank?
- Is having a professional football team an economic drain or benefit for cities?
- Does hosting the Super Bowl economically help or hurt the host city?
- Robert Boland Executive-in-Residence in the Department of Sports Administration at the Ohio University College of Business
- Patrick Walsh Assistant Professor of Sport Management in the David B. Falk College of Sport and Human Dynamics at Syracuse University
- Yuhei Inoue Assistant Professor of Sport Management in the School of Kinesiology at University of Minnesota
- Tim DeSchriver Associate Professor of Sport Management in the Alfred Lerner College of Business & Economics at University of Delaware
- Elizabeth B. Delia Assistant Professor of Sport Management in the Isenberg School of Management at University of Massachusetts Amherst
- William P. Putsis Professor of Marketing in the Kenan-Flagler Business School at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Matt Katz Assistant Professor of Sport Management in the Isenberg School of Management at University of Massachusetts Amherst
- William A. Sutton Director of the Sport & Entertainment Business Program in the Muma College of Business at University of South Florida
- David Berri Professor of Economics at Southern Utah University
- Michael R. Lysko Professor of Practice and Director of the Sport Management Program at Southern Methodist University
- Improving the live experience, as the home delivery of the product is so good and readily available it could threaten live attendance.
- Fear of concussions and other long term injuries could lead moms to withhold permission to participate in football - pushing them into other share sports.
- The growth and improvement of American soccer on the world stage - the MLS is very popular right now and as the quality of play improves it will continue to grab market share.
In order to identify the best and worst cities for football fans, WalletHub’s analysts compared 244 U.S. cities with at least one college or professional football team across two division-based categories, including “NFL” and “NCAA (FBS & FCS).”
We examined each division-based category using 17 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for football fans.
In order to determine the weight for each division, we surveyed the top-performing five teams in each division’s Facebook account, summed the number of “Likes” and calculated the proportion that each league represented in total. Thus, the weight attributed to each division was based on its popularity.
We then calculated the overall score for each city using its weighted average across all metrics and constructed the final ranking based on the resulting scores.
We categorized each city according to the following population sizes:
- Large cities: More than 300,000 people
- Midsize cities: 125,000 to 300,000 people
- Small cities: Fewer than 125,000 people
- Number of NFL Teams: Full Weight (~9.33 Points)
- Performance Level of NFL Team: Full Weight (~9.33 Points)Note: This metric was calculated using the past three seasons’ averages and the following formula: Number of Wins / Total Number of Games Played.
- Number of NFL Championships Wins: Full Weight (~9.33 Points)
- Number of NFL Division Championship Wins: Half Weight (~4.67 Points)
- Franchise Value: Half Weight (~4.67 Points)Note: This metric measures the team(s) estimated value in millions of dollars.
- Average Ticket Price for an NFL Game: Full Weight (~9.33 Points)
- NFL Fan Engagement: Full Weight (~9.33 Points)Note: This metric measures the number of Twitter followers and Facebook “Likes” per capita.
- NFL Stadium Capacity: Half Weight (~4.67 Points)Note: This metric was calculated using the following formula: Stadium Capacity / Total City Population.
- Attendance: Half Weight (~4.67 Points)Note: This metric was calculated using the following formula: Average Home-Fan Attendance / Arena Capacity.
- Popularity Index: Half Weight (~4.67 Points)
- Number of College Football (FBS & FCS) Teams: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)
- Performance Level of College Football (FBS & FCS) Team(s): Full Weight (~5.00 Points)Note: This metric was calculated using the past three seasons’ averages and the following formula: Number of Wins / Total Number of Games Played.
- Number of College Football (FBS & FCS) Championship Wins: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)
- Number of College Football (FBS & FCS) Division Championship Wins: Half Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Minimum Season-Ticket Price for a College Football (FBS & FCS) Game: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)
- College Football Fan Engagement: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)Note: This metric measures the number of Twitter followers and Facebook “Likes” per capita.
- College Football (FBS & FCS) Stadium Capacity: Half Weight (~2.50 Points)Note: This metric was calculated using the following formula: Stadium Capacity / Total City Population.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau, Team Marketing Report, ESPN and each team’s website.
from Wallet HubWallet Hub
via Finance Xpress