2017’s Best Places to Get Married
3:45 AMPosted by: Richie Bernardo
Anyone who’s ever organized a wedding knows all too well how demanding and protracted the process can be. It’s the reason couples hire professional event planners to do the heavy lifting — and also why the term “bridezilla” became a permanent entry in the wedding glossary.
Between sending invitations, securing reservations, planning a menu and obsessing over final touches on the cake, it’s no wonder the big day is arranged months, even years, in advance — and deservingly so. Tying the knot is a huge commitment, and the $60 billion wedding industry ain’t one to complain.
At WalletHub, we understand the logistical and financial stresses of that typically long march to “I do.” So in order to assist with the planning process, our data team compared the 150 biggest cities to find the cheapest and most convenient wedding destinations that also promise a memorable occasion. We examined each city across 20 key indicators of nuptial-friendliness, ranging from “average wedding cost” to “venues and event spaces per capita” to “hotel availability.” Read on for the winners, meaningful advice from wedding and marriage experts, and a full description of our methodology.
Main FindingsEmbed on your website<iframe src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/embed/18721/geochart-married.html" width="556" height="347" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe> <div style="width:556px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="http://ift.tt/2kmik8W;
Overall Rank |
City |
Total Score |
Effective |
Annual |
Difference |
Annual |
Adjusted |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Las Vegas, NV | 74.21 | 57 | 5 | 1 | ||
2 | Orlando, FL | 74.04 | 88 | 1 | 3 | ||
3 | Atlanta, GA | 69.99 | 64 | 2 | 9 | ||
4 | Tampa, FL | 65.43 | 41 | 11 | 5 | ||
5 | Cincinnati, OH | 64.63 | 27 | 8 | 27 | ||
6 | Scottsdale, AZ | 63.03 | 53 | 12 | 8 | ||
7 | Salt Lake City, UT | 62.92 | 92 | 3 | 22 | ||
8 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 60.83 | 65 | 10 | 16 | ||
9 | Knoxville, TN | 60.59 | 4 | 29 | 42 | ||
10 | Miami, FL | 60.55 | 99 | 6 | 11 | ||
11 | St. Louis, MO | 59.78 | 82 | 7 | 25 | ||
12 | New Orleans, LA | 59.67 | 58 | 27 | 10 | ||
13 | Springfield, MO | 57.81 | 3 | 40 | 45 | ||
14 | Boise, ID | 57.14 | 9 | 49 | 32 | ||
15 | Tucson, AZ | 56.94 | 28 | 64 | 14 | ||
16 | Birmingham, AL | 56.13 | 19 | 26 | 59 | ||
17 | Richmond, VA | 55.95 | 63 | 13 | 36 | ||
18 | Austin, TX | 55.62 | 91 | 17 | 20 | ||
19 | San Diego, CA | 55.04 | 118 | 18 | 4 | ||
20 | Tempe, AZ | 55.03 | 47 | 34 | 23 | ||
21 | Reno, NV | 54.53 | 77 | 28 | 24 | ||
22 | Albuquerque, NM | 54.26 | 15 | 96 | 26 | ||
23 | Portland, OR | 53.36 | 116 | 15 | 13 | ||
24 | Spokane, WA | 52.49 | 22 | 50 | 43 | ||
25 | Sacramento, CA | 52.48 | 121 | 14 | 15 | ||
26 | El Paso, TX | 52.13 | 1 | 141 | 99 | ||
27 | San Francisco, CA | 52.13 | 150 | 4 | 2 | ||
28 | Chattanooga, TN | 51.91 | 12 | 43 | 83 | ||
29 | Pittsburgh, PA | 51.74 | 102 | 21 | 30 | ||
30 | Denver, CO | 51.56 | 115 | 19 | 18 | ||
31 | Grand Rapids, MI | 51.37 | 32 | 31 | 73 | ||
32 | Seattle, WA | 51.24 | 125 | 16 | 12 | ||
33 | Baton Rouge, LA | 50.47 | 34 | 48 | 46 | ||
34 | Mobile, AL | 50.07 | 8 | 87 | 85 | ||
35 | Minneapolis, MN | 49.31 | 96 | 32 | 31 | ||
36 | Tulsa, OK | 49.18 | 20 | 98 | 47 | ||
37 | Honolulu, HI | 48.84 | 145 | 9 | 6 | ||
38 | St. Petersburg, FL | 48.73 | 44 | 72 | 40 | ||
39 | Los Angeles, CA | 48.06 | 128 | 35 | 7 | ||
40 | Modesto, CA | 47.90 | 93 | 36 | 35 | ||
41 | Kansas City, MO | 47.86 | 50 | 83 | 37 | ||
42 | Louisville, KY | 47.47 | 26 | 92 | 66 | ||
43 | Memphis, TN | 47.36 | 5 | 127 | 100 | ||
44 | Huntsville, AL | 46.76 | 33 | 85 | 67 | ||
45 | Omaha, NE | 46.74 | 40 | 78 | 53 | ||
46 | Houston, TX | 46.54 | 97 | 46 | 33 | ||
47 | Augusta, GA | 46.49 | 10 | 94 | 110 | ||
48 | Brownsville, TX | 46.47 | 2 | 148 | 146 | ||
49 | Tallahassee, FL | 46.03 | 62 | 47 | 64 | ||
50 | Phoenix, AZ | 45.98 | 51 | 109 | 38 | ||
51 | Shreveport, LA | 45.79 | 7 | 118 | 113 | ||
52 | Oklahoma City, OK | 45.76 | 30 | 116 | 61 | ||
53 | Madison, WI | 45.53 | 66 | 69 | 48 | ||
54 | Fayetteville, NC | 45.43 | 16 | 75 | 114 | ||
55 | Dallas, TX | 45.24 | 73 | 55 | 55 | ||
56 | San Antonio, TX | 44.84 | 54 | 76 | 60 | ||
57 | Rochester, NY | 44.69 | 117 | 23 | 58 | ||
58 | Nashville, TN | 44.56 | 69 | 57 | 68 | ||
59 | Colorado Springs, CO | 44.54 | 94 | 73 | 39 | ||
60 | Amarillo, TX | 44.46 | 31 | 113 | 91 | ||
61 | Bakersfield, CA | 44.45 | 84 | 62 | 52 | ||
62 | Raleigh, NC | 44.39 | 74 | 56 | 69 | ||
63 | Lubbock, TX | 44.32 | 18 | 88 | 120 | ||
64 | Anaheim, CA | 44.06 | 126 | 37 | 28 | ||
65 | Columbus, OH | 44.06 | 49 | 105 | 57 | ||
66 | Charlotte, NC | 43.94 | 39 | 93 | 88 | ||
67 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 43.78 | 35 | 124 | 78 | ||
68 | Columbus, GA | 43.67 | 13 | 114 | 119 | ||
69 | Overland Park, KS | 43.53 | 36 | 84 | 104 | ||
70 | Laredo, TX | 43.07 | 6 | 147 | 137 | ||
71 | Glendale, CA | 42.98 | 122 | 22 | 63 | ||
72 | Mesa, AZ | 42.96 | 47 | 104 | 75 | ||
73 | Buffalo, NY | 42.78 | 107 | 39 | 56 | ||
74 | Montgomery, AL | 42.75 | 11 | 117 | 135 | ||
75 | Cleveland, OH | 42.65 | 100 | 52 | 54 | ||
76 | Durham, NC | 42.45 | 60 | 81 | 89 | ||
77 | Jackson, MS | 42.34 | 21 | 111 | 123 | ||
78 | Little Rock, AR | 42.25 | 29 | 77 | 127 | ||
79 | Washington, DC | 41.92 | 143 | 30 | 17 | ||
80 | Chandler, AZ | 41.82 | 55 | 108 | 82 | ||
81 | Plano, TX | 41.62 | 81 | 66 | 95 | ||
82 | Greensboro, NC | 41.54 | 14 | 149 | 101 | ||
83 | Fresno, CA | 41.52 | 78 | 91 | 81 | ||
84 | Lincoln, NE | 41.45 | 68 | 82 | 96 | ||
85 | Henderson, NV | 41.42 | 61 | 126 | 71 | ||
86 | Norfolk, VA | 41.35 | 59 | 121 | 76 | ||
87 | Sioux Falls, SD | 41.32 | 43 | 95 | 107 | ||
88 | Wichita, KS | 41.25 | 23 | 120 | 118 | ||
89 | Chicago, IL | 41.09 | 131 | 58 | 29 | ||
90 | Corpus Christi, TX | 41.02 | 25 | 128 | 115 | ||
91 | Milwaukee, WI | 40.80 | 95 | 103 | 50 | ||
92 | Santa Rosa, CA | 40.67 | 132 | 20 | 74 | ||
93 | Indianapolis, IN | 40.66 | 46 | 145 | 79 | ||
94 | Vancouver, WA | 40.43 | 112 | 33 | 97 | ||
95 | Akron, OH | 39.93 | 42 | 97 | 121 | ||
96 | Jacksonville, FL | 39.84 | 87 | 110 | 77 | ||
97 | Fort Worth, TX | 39.78 | 79 | 107 | 87 | ||
98 | North Las Vegas, NV | 39.74 | 45 | 53 | 126 | ||
99 | Virginia Beach, VA | 39.63 | 98 | 90 | 72 | ||
100 | Tacoma, WA | 39.58 | 108 | 42 | 94 | ||
101 | Des Moines, IA | 39.51 | 76 | 79 | 109 | ||
102 | Detroit, MI | 39.42 | 67 | 140 | 80 | ||
103 | Toledo, OH | 39.42 | 17 | 138 | 138 | ||
104 | Long Beach, CA | 39.10 | 136 | 44 | 34 | ||
105 | Garden Grove, CA | 38.96 | 105 | 60 | 90 | ||
106 | Winston-Salem, NC | 38.95 | 24 | 150 | 103 | ||
107 | Glendale, AZ | 38.76 | 52 | 125 | 98 | ||
108 | St. Paul, MN | 38.73 | 103 | 71 | 93 | ||
109 | Fort Wayne, IN | 38.72 | 37 | 89 | 141 | ||
110 | Irving, TX | 38.37 | 71 | 67 | 128 | ||
111 | Irvine, CA | 38.22 | 127 | 38 | 70 | ||
112 | Baltimore, MD | 37.80 | 123 | 65 | 51 | ||
113 | Cape Coral, FL | 37.23 | 85 | 146 | 65 | ||
114 | Arlington, TX | 37.03 | 71 | 122 | 111 | ||
115 | Gilbert, AZ | 36.79 | 38 | 106 | 130 | ||
116 | Hialeah, FL | 36.48 | 80 | 102 | 122 | ||
117 | Newport News, VA | 36.16 | 75 | 131 | 116 | ||
118 | Huntington Beach, CA | 36.12 | 138 | 41 | 49 | ||
119 | Philadelphia, PA | 35.83 | 140 | 112 | 21 | ||
120 | Oakland, CA | 35.26 | 146 | 25 | 44 | ||
121 | Stockton, CA | 35.23 | 104 | 130 | 92 | ||
122 | Chesapeake, VA | 35.14 | 56 | 136 | 133 | ||
123 | Peoria, AZ | 35.07 | 86 | 133 | 112 | ||
124 | Oceanside, CA | 35.06 | 120 | 86 | 86 | ||
125 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 34.32 | 89 | 139 | 117 | ||
126 | San Jose, CA | 34.28 | 141 | 45 | 62 | ||
127 | New York, NY | 33.52 | 147 | 68 | 19 | ||
128 | Riverside, CA | 33.30 | 130 | 59 | 102 | ||
129 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 33.24 | 114 | 70 | 125 | ||
130 | Santa Ana, CA | 33.21 | 129 | 61 | 105 | ||
131 | San Bernardino, CA | 32.72 | 110 | 115 | 108 | ||
132 | Ontario, CA | 32.38 | 119 | 63 | 124 | ||
133 | Aurora, CO | 31.96 | 101 | 100 | 142 | ||
134 | Garland, TX | 31.87 | 90 | 135 | 139 | ||
135 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 31.48 | 83 | 142 | 148 | ||
136 | Chula Vista, CA | 31.40 | 109 | 80 | 144 | ||
137 | Providence, RI | 30.94 | 133 | 99 | 84 | ||
138 | Grand Prairie, TX | 30.75 | 70 | 144 | 140 | ||
139 | Anchorage, AK | 30.53 | 124 | 119 | 106 | ||
140 | Boston, MA | 30.15 | 149 | 54 | 41 | ||
141 | Fontana, CA | 27.78 | 110 | 132 | 147 | ||
142 | Aurora, IL | 25.92 | 106 | 137 | 149 | ||
143 | Jersey City, NJ | 25.91 | 139 | 74 | 132 | ||
144 | Moreno Valley, CA | 25.88 | 113 | 143 | 143 | ||
145 | Santa Clarita, CA | 25.77 | 134 | 101 | 131 | ||
146 | Fremont, CA | 25.70 | 142 | 51 | 136 | ||
147 | Oxnard, CA | 24.15 | 137 | 128 | 129 | ||
148 | Worcester, MA | 22.57 | 135 | 134 | 145 | ||
149 | Yonkers, NY | 21.00 | 148 | 24 | 150 | ||
150 | Newark, NJ | 20.31 | 144 | 123 | 134 |
Marriage is not only a big life decision, but it also can be a hefty financial commitment because money often dictates the extravagance and location of the wedding. But some couples have far fewer resources to dedicate for their special day. For advice on such matters and how to boost the local economy through the wedding business, we turned to a panel of experts in family studies, personal finance and local administration. Click on the experts’ profiles to read their bios and thoughts on the following key questions:
- How should a couple decide how much they should spend on a wedding?
- How should a couple decide where to get married?
- What tips do you have for a couple planning a wedding and hoping to stay on budget?
- Weddings can often be an economic boost to local businesses. What measures can local authorities undertake in order to stimulate weddings in their respective communities?
Luke Erickson Personal finance Educator at University of Idaho Extension, Madison County
Diane Margaret Joyal Research Coordinator at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Owner and Lead Designer of Bowerbird Flowers and Apothecary
Dorris Perryman Assistant Professor of Accounting at Bristol Community College
Cameron Gordon Associate Professor of Psychology at University of North Carolina, Wilmington
Carolyn Washburn Family and Consumer Sciences Agent at Utah State University Extension
Karl Andrew Pillemer Hazel E. Reed Professor of Human Development in the College of Human Ecology at Cornell University
Karen J. Prager Professor of Psychology and Program Head for Gender Studies in the School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences at University of Texas at Dallas
Dasha B. Marchetti Executive Director of Continuing Education and Professor of Business Studies at Bucks County Community College






- Let the other person have his or her say before interrupting;
- Avoid letting anger lead you to contemptuous remarks, like insults or sarcasm;
- Take at time out if you need it – not everything needs to be discussed until resolved; drop a contentious issue and come back to it.


In order to identify the best and worst cities in which to tie the knot, WalletHub’s analysts compared 150 of the most populated U.S. cities across three key dimensions: 1) Costs, 2) Facilities & Services and 3) Activities & Attractions.
We examined those dimensions using 20 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for weddings.
We then calculated the overall score for each city using its weighted average across all metrics and constructed the final ranking based on the resulting scores.
Costs – Total Points: 40- Average Wedding Cost: Triple Weight (~24.00 Points)
- Price of a Three-Star Hotel: Full Weight (~8.00 Points)
- Restaurant-Meal Costs: Full Weight (~8.00 Points)Note: “Restaurant Meal” refers to a three-course meal for two.
- Wedding Chapels & Churches per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Venues & Event Spaces per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Party-Equipment Rentals per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Event Planners per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Videographers & Photographers per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Musicians & DJs per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Makeup Artists & Hair Salons per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Bridal Shops per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Flower Shops per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
- Limousine Rentals per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s Best & Worst Foodie Cities ranking.
- Hotels per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s Cities with the Best & Worst Weather ranking.
- Restaurants & Bars per Capita: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s Most Fun Cities in America ranking.
- Number of Attractions: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)
- Popularity as a Travel Destination: Full Weight(~6.00 Points)
- Foodie-Friendliness: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)
- Weather: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)
- Amusement & Entertainment: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)
Sources: Data used to create these rankings were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Wedding Report, Kayak.com, Numbeo, Tripadvisor, Travbuddy.com, Yelp and WalletHub research.
from Wallet HubWallet Hub
via Finance Xpress
0 comments