2018’s Best Foodie Cities in America
2:34 AMPosted by: Adam McCann
Americans today liberally apply the term “foodie” to anyone who loves gourmet dining. But foodie culture isn’t limited to restaurants. More importantly, far fewer than the many who claim to be foodies truly deserve the label. “Authentic” foodies, according to experts, not only crave new and different flavors but also savor the exploratory experience of eating, learning and discovering food.
Needless to say, the foodie lifestyle can be quite expensive, considering that restaurant prices alone have risen. In fact, Americans spent more money at food establishments than at grocery stores for the first time in 2015. Dining in can be comparatively more cost-effective — not to mention equally satisfying to the taste buds — but only to the extent that grocery-store prices have declined. Eating at home still can be pricey, depending on the local cost of living as well as the type and quality of ingredients used in preparing homemade meals.
Fortunately, culinary hotspots across the U.S. offer plenty of affordable options for cash-strapped epicures. These wallet-friendly cities cater to foodies who prefer to cook at home, explore the local gastronomy or both. To determine the best and cheapest foodie scenes, WalletHub’s analysts compared more than 180 U.S. cities across 24 key indicators of foodie-friendliness. Our data set ranges from cost of groceries to affordability and accessibility of high-quality restaurants to food festivals per capita. Read on for the winners, expert foodie insight and a full description of our methodology. Happy eating!
Main FindingsEmbed on your website<iframe src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/embed/7522/foodie-geochart.html" width="556" height="347" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe> <div style="width:556px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="https://ift.tt/2EabdLX>
Best Foodie Cities in America
Overall Rank (1 = Best) |
City |
Total Score |
‘Affordability’ Rank |
‘Diversity, Accessibility & Quality’ Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | San Francisco, CA | 71.08 | 151 | 1 |
2 | Portland, OR | 69.66 | 17 | 5 |
3 | New York, NY | 69.02 | 171 | 2 |
4 | Los Angeles, CA | 67.54 | 83 | 4 |
5 | Miami, FL | 66.94 | 114 | 3 |
6 | Orlando, FL | 66.34 | 21 | 7 |
7 | Austin, TX | 64.03 | 4 | 10 |
8 | Las Vegas, NV | 63.92 | 31 | 8 |
9 | San Diego, CA | 63.03 | 45 | 9 |
10 | Seattle, WA | 62.46 | 166 | 6 |
11 | Tampa, FL | 59.88 | 70 | 11 |
12 | Atlanta, GA | 58.53 | 106 | 13 |
13 | Chicago, IL | 58.03 | 123 | 12 |
14 | Philadelphia, PA | 56.62 | 86 | 15 |
15 | Sacramento, CA | 56.16 | 33 | 20 |
16 | Houston, TX | 55.18 | 12 | 22 |
17 | St. Louis, MO | 54.91 | 65 | 18 |
18 | Denver, CO | 54.73 | 92 | 17 |
19 | Washington, DC | 53.67 | 173 | 14 |
20 | Cincinnati, OH | 53.54 | 9 | 23 |
21 | Pittsburgh, PA | 52.78 | 49 | 21 |
22 | Oakland, CA | 52.54 | 135 | 19 |
23 | Phoenix, AZ | 51.56 | 10 | 28 |
24 | Honolulu, HI | 50.42 | 179 | 16 |
25 | San Antonio, TX | 49.68 | 1 | 41 |
26 | Minneapolis, MN | 49.57 | 71 | 24 |
27 | Richmond, VA | 48.70 | 39 | 29 |
28 | Tucson, AZ | 48.38 | 13 | 35 |
29 | Columbus, OH | 48.33 | 8 | 36 |
30 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 48.22 | 47 | 31 |
31 | Buffalo, NY | 48.12 | 73 | 26 |
32 | Rochester, NY | 48.01 | 79 | 27 |
33 | Salt Lake City, UT | 48.01 | 89 | 25 |
34 | Louisville, KY | 47.07 | 2 | 46 |
35 | Milwaukee, WI | 46.39 | 15 | 45 |
36 | Dallas, TX | 46.38 | 32 | 40 |
37 | Grand Rapids, MI | 45.94 | 30 | 39 |
38 | Cleveland, OH | 45.83 | 48 | 37 |
39 | Albuquerque, NM | 45.61 | 11 | 51 |
40 | Boston, MA | 44.64 | 119 | 32 |
41 | Long Beach, CA | 44.41 | 67 | 43 |
42 | San Jose, CA | 44.14 | 163 | 30 |
43 | Reno, NV | 44.13 | 46 | 44 |
44 | Indianapolis, IN | 43.84 | 16 | 59 |
45 | Vancouver, WA | 43.65 | 141 | 33 |
46 | Fresno, CA | 43.53 | 23 | 57 |
47 | Santa Ana, CA | 43.28 | 128 | 34 |
48 | Scottsdale, AZ | 43.17 | 60 | 48 |
49 | Tempe, AZ | 43.05 | 25 | 66 |
50 | Spokane, WA | 42.92 | 56 | 52 |
51 | Bakersfield, CA | 42.55 | 62 | 49 |
52 | Charlotte, NC | 42.54 | 57 | 56 |
53 | Jacksonville, FL | 42.19 | 40 | 60 |
54 | Baltimore, MD | 42.09 | 68 | 55 |
55 | Hialeah, FL | 41.93 | 104 | 53 |
56 | New Orleans, LA | 41.93 | 153 | 38 |
57 | Omaha, NE | 41.82 | 24 | 73 |
58 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 41.68 | 6 | 76 |
59 | Anaheim, CA | 41.60 | 103 | 47 |
60 | Charleston, SC | 41.30 | 116 | 50 |
61 | Boise, ID | 41.22 | 42 | 65 |
62 | Oklahoma City, OK | 40.90 | 28 | 79 |
63 | Detroit, MI | 40.79 | 5 | 91 |
64 | Virginia Beach, VA | 40.70 | 101 | 58 |
65 | Nashville, TN | 40.43 | 122 | 54 |
66 | Fort Worth, TX | 40.21 | 20 | 85 |
67 | Springfield, MO | 40.03 | 26 | 82 |
68 | Des Moines, IA | 39.88 | 37 | 81 |
69 | Tacoma, WA | 39.64 | 81 | 70 |
70 | Madison, WI | 39.59 | 80 | 64 |
71 | Mesa, AZ | 39.46 | 22 | 92 |
72 | Santa Rosa, CA | 39.38 | 175 | 42 |
73 | Portland, ME | 39.30 | 126 | 61 |
74 | Colorado Springs, CO | 38.99 | 35 | 88 |
75 | Huntington Beach, CA | 38.76 | 85 | 71 |
76 | Jersey City, NJ | 38.30 | 87 | 75 |
77 | Anchorage, AK | 37.92 | 138 | 63 |
78 | Kansas City, MO | 37.89 | 61 | 90 |
79 | Newark, NJ | 37.88 | 136 | 68 |
80 | Salem, OR | 37.70 | 50 | 83 |
81 | Chandler, AZ | 37.68 | 19 | 107 |
82 | Raleigh, NC | 37.63 | 145 | 69 |
83 | Tulsa, OK | 37.35 | 51 | 97 |
84 | Riverside, CA | 37.34 | 148 | 67 |
85 | Garden Grove, CA | 37.33 | 34 | 100 |
86 | Knoxville, TN | 37.30 | 120 | 74 |
87 | El Paso, TX | 37.30 | 29 | 112 |
88 | Durham, NC | 37.24 | 108 | 78 |
89 | Providence, RI | 37.17 | 127 | 77 |
90 | St. Paul, MN | 37.15 | 107 | 80 |
91 | St. Petersburg, FL | 37.05 | 74 | 84 |
92 | Stockton, CA | 36.91 | 162 | 62 |
93 | Columbia, SC | 36.90 | 66 | 98 |
94 | Tallahassee, FL | 36.86 | 44 | 96 |
95 | Aurora, CO | 36.81 | 55 | 94 |
96 | Birmingham, AL | 36.68 | 82 | 89 |
97 | Wilmington, DE | 36.64 | 58 | 110 |
98 | Oceanside, CA | 36.59 | 77 | 95 |
99 | Irvine, CA | 36.48 | 159 | 72 |
100 | Billings, MT | 36.43 | 3 | 149 |
101 | Modesto, CA | 36.26 | 112 | 87 |
102 | Missoula, MT | 36.21 | 41 | 114 |
103 | Greensboro, NC | 36.18 | 36 | 101 |
104 | Plano, TX | 35.57 | 94 | 93 |
105 | Lincoln, NE | 35.34 | 84 | 102 |
106 | Arlington, TX | 35.33 | 43 | 136 |
107 | Glendale, CA | 35.24 | 95 | 105 |
108 | Sioux Falls, SD | 34.87 | 52 | 116 |
109 | Memphis, TN | 34.84 | 111 | 103 |
110 | Laredo, TX | 34.75 | 18 | 151 |
111 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 34.51 | 100 | 115 |
112 | Peoria, AZ | 34.43 | 59 | 133 |
113 | Lubbock, TX | 34.35 | 99 | 108 |
114 | Cape Coral, FL | 34.23 | 7 | 125 |
115 | Huntsville, AL | 34.19 | 140 | 106 |
116 | Corpus Christi, TX | 34.06 | 38 | 135 |
117 | Burlington, VT | 33.91 | 143 | 111 |
118 | Norfolk, VA | 33.90 | 98 | 109 |
119 | Oxnard, CA | 33.87 | 167 | 86 |
120 | Chesapeake, VA | 33.78 | 93 | 129 |
121 | Wichita, KS | 33.75 | 91 | 120 |
122 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 33.63 | 53 | 137 |
123 | Chula Vista, CA | 33.53 | 124 | 113 |
124 | Brownsville, TX | 33.34 | 72 | 155 |
125 | Gilbert, AZ | 33.22 | 14 | 130 |
126 | Glendale, AZ | 32.86 | 27 | 124 |
127 | Fort Wayne, IN | 32.79 | 78 | 132 |
128 | Henderson, NV | 32.66 | 90 | 121 |
129 | Toledo, OH | 32.49 | 64 | 131 |
130 | Charleston, WV | 32.48 | 63 | 167 |
131 | Newport News, VA | 32.47 | 96 | 134 |
132 | Dover, DE | 32.25 | 76 | 157 |
133 | Akron, OH | 32.20 | 137 | 126 |
134 | Manchester, NH | 32.05 | 88 | 146 |
135 | Baton Rouge, LA | 31.93 | 170 | 104 |
136 | Little Rock, AR | 31.58 | 146 | 123 |
137 | Amarillo, TX | 31.46 | 75 | 150 |
138 | Irving, TX | 31.45 | 118 | 138 |
139 | Fremont, CA | 31.40 | 174 | 99 |
140 | Overland Park, KS | 30.63 | 165 | 117 |
141 | San Bernardino, CA | 30.61 | 109 | 143 |
142 | Chattanooga, TN | 30.56 | 158 | 128 |
143 | Fargo, ND | 30.52 | 132 | 154 |
144 | Santa Clarita, CA | 30.46 | 131 | 140 |
145 | Mobile, AL | 30.31 | 117 | 145 |
146 | Worcester, MA | 30.08 | 160 | 122 |
147 | North Las Vegas, NV | 29.80 | 113 | 141 |
148 | Winston-Salem, NC | 29.79 | 154 | 139 |
149 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 29.58 | 133 | 152 |
150 | Garland, TX | 29.41 | 110 | 158 |
151 | Columbus, GA | 29.22 | 102 | 169 |
152 | Nashua, NH | 29.20 | 150 | 162 |
153 | Fontana, CA | 28.92 | 169 | 142 |
154 | Shreveport, LA | 28.80 | 125 | 163 |
155 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 28.70 | 156 | 144 |
156 | Augusta, GA | 28.62 | 121 | 161 |
157 | Aurora, IL | 28.54 | 161 | 148 |
158 | Warwick, RI | 28.53 | 142 | 153 |
159 | Casper, WY | 28.49 | 54 | 180 |
160 | Huntington, WV | 28.48 | 69 | 177 |
161 | Bismarck, ND | 28.38 | 130 | 173 |
162 | New Haven, CT | 28.34 | 178 | 119 |
163 | Fayetteville, NC | 28.30 | 139 | 164 |
164 | South Burlington, VT | 28.12 | 147 | 156 |
165 | Rapid City, SD | 28.02 | 157 | 160 |
166 | Las Cruces, NM | 27.90 | 105 | 176 |
167 | Ontario, CA | 27.86 | 172 | 127 |
168 | Fort Smith, AR | 27.70 | 134 | 172 |
169 | Grand Prairie, TX | 27.56 | 115 | 165 |
170 | Yonkers, NY | 27.41 | 180 | 118 |
171 | Bridgeport, CT | 26.83 | 176 | 147 |
172 | Cheyenne, WY | 26.63 | 97 | 179 |
173 | Montgomery, AL | 26.57 | 149 | 170 |
174 | Lewiston, ME | 26.41 | 152 | 174 |
175 | Columbia, MD | 26.16 | 164 | 171 |
176 | Moreno Valley, CA | 25.73 | 155 | 159 |
177 | Jackson, MS | 24.40 | 177 | 168 |
178 | Nampa, ID | 24.15 | 129 | 175 |
179 | Gulfport, MS | 24.01 | 168 | 182 |
180 | West Valley City, UT | 23.73 | 144 | 181 |
181 | Juneau, AK | 23.10 | 181 | 166 |
182 | Pearl City, HI | 17.46 | 182 | 178 |
Wallet-conscious foodies don’t always have to sacrifice quality for price. For money-saving advice and policy-related tips for improving the local food scene, we asked a panel of experts to weigh in with their thoughts on the following key questions:
- What tips can you provide to foodies on a tight budget?
- In evaluating the best foodie cities for your wallet, what are the top five indicators?
- What tips can you offer to health-conscious foodies who like to eat out?
- What role, if any, can local authorities play in improving the food scene in their city?
John Stanton Professor of Management, Saint Joseph’s University
Marion Nestle Paulette Goddard Professor and Professor Emerita, NFS, New York University
Martha Carlin Professor, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Jeffrey Miller Ph.D., Associate Professor and Program Coordinator Hospitality Management, Colorado State University
Kolleen Guy Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of History, The University of Texas at San Antonio
In order to determine the best and cheapest local foodie scenes, WalletHub’s analysts compared 182 cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across two key dimensions, “Affordability” and “Diversity, Accessibility & Quality.”
We evaluated those dimensions using 24 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions and costs for foodies. For metrics marked with an asterisk (*), we used the square root of the population to calculate the population size in order to avoid overcompensating for minor differences across cities.
Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its total score and used the resulting scores to rank-order the cities in our sample. In determining our sample, we considered only the “city proper” in each case and excluded surrounding cities in the metro area.
Affordability – Total Points: 30- Cost of Groceries: Double Weight (~6.67 Points)
- Accessibility & Affordability of High-Quality Restaurants: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)Note: This metric measures the prevalence of affordable restaurants with ratings of at least 4.5 stars.
- Restaurant Meal Cost: Double Weight (~6.67 Points)
- Sales Tax: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)
- Food Tax: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)
- Restaurant Tax: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)
- Average Beer & Wine Price: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)Note: “Average Beer Price” refers to the average price, excluding any deposit, of a six-pack of 12-ounce Heineken containers, and “Average Wine Price” refers to the average price of a 1.5-liter bottle of Chablis or Chenin Blanc or any white table wine.
- Restaurants per Capita*: Triple Weight (~11.51 Points)
- Ratio of Full-Service Restaurants to Fast-Food Establishments: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Restaurant Diversity: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Presence of Michelin-Starred Restaurants: Quarter Weight (~0.96 Points)
- Average Ranking of Restaurants on Yelp’s “Top 100 Places to Eat in the U.S.” List: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Food Trucks per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Access to Healthy Food Options: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Farmers Markets & CSA Programs per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)Note: “CSA” refers to community-supported agriculture.
- Ice Cream & Frozen Yogurt Shops per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Craft Breweries & Wineries per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Coffee & Tea Shops per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Gourmet Specialty-Food Stores per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)Note: “Gourmet Specialty-Food Stores” includes, among others, candy stores, chocolatiers and cheese shops.
- Grocery Stores per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Butcher Shops per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Food Festivals per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Cooking Schools per Capita*: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)
- Food Freshness: Full Weight (~3.84 Points)Note: The percentage of workers involved in agricultural activities was used as a proxy for this metric.
- YouTube (for web embedding National)
- YouTube (for web embedding Portland, OR)
- Raw files (for editing into clips)
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau, Council for Community and Economic Research, Federation of Tax Administrators, Tax Foundation, County Health Rankings, Sale-Tax.com, Numbeo and Yelp.
Image: Rawpixel.com / Shutterstock.com
from Wallet HubWallet Hub
via Finance Xpress
0 comments